Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., legal theory, and judicial restraint小奥利弗·温德尔·霍姆斯，法律理论与司法节制

作者简介：
　　Frederic R. Kellogg is a scholar of jurisprudence and has been Visiting Scholar in the Department of Philosophy at the George Washington University, Senior Fulbright Fellow at the University of Warsaw, and Visiting Professor at Moscow State University. He is the author of The Formative Essays of Justice Holmes: The Making of an American Legal Philosophy, as well as numerous articles on legal philosophy and jurisprudence.  

Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr., is considered by many to be the most influential American jurist. The voluminous literature devoted to his writings and legal thought, however, is diverse and inconsistent. In this study, Frederic R. Kellogg follows Holmes's intellectual path from his early writings through his judicial career. He offers a fresh perspective that addresses the views of Holmes's leading critics and explains his relevance to the contemporary controversy over judicial activism and restraint. Holmes is shown to be an original legal theorist who reconceived common law as a theory of social inquiry and who applied his insights to constitutional law. From his empirical and naturalist perspective on law emerged Holmes's distinctive judicial and constitutional restraint. Kellogg distinguishes Holmes from analytical legal positivism and contrasts him with a range of thinkers, including John Austin, Thomas Hobbes, H. L. A. Hart, Ronald Dworkin, Antonin Scalia, and other leading legal theorists.

Preface page
1 A Time for Law
2 Playing King: Connections and Misconceptions
3 Holmes’s Conception of Law
4 Common Law Theory Revisited
5 Holmes and Legal Classification
6 The General Theory of Liability
7 Morals and Skepticism in Law
8 Judges, Principles, and Policy
9 Common Law Constitutionalism
10 Holmes’s Theory in Retrospect
11 Conclusion
Appendix
Bibliography
Index