刑法学（Law Express 法学初阶——西方法学经典教材系列影印双语注释本）（著名法学家江平教授、许章润教授联袂推荐）pdf/txt下载_在线阅读全文

当前位置:首页 > 教材 > 研究生/本科/专科教材 > 刑法学（Law Express 法学初阶——西方法学经典教材系列影印双语注释本）（著名法学家江平教授、许章润教授联袂推荐）

编辑推荐

　　Pearson出版社授权华中科技大学出版社出版的“法学初阶西方法学经典教材系列影印双语注释本”正式与大家见面了！！！本书采取影印版附加中英文双语的全新注释方式，便于读者的学习与理解。*为原汁原味的英国法内容配以图表、案例、重点词汇、复习笔记、参考资源等内容，全新的英美法教学模式，地道的法律英语表述方式，不仅展现出法学古老严谨的本质，更彰显出法律独特的魅力！五彩缤纷的样式，让法学书籍也可以这样美丽！！！

内容简介

　　刑法，是法学公法中最为重要的部门法之一，也是法学本科生必修课程。
　　在这本教材中，作者采用简明易懂的语言将其重点知识，如刑事责任的要素，英美法中关于故意与过失的界定，各个重点罪名的详述等内容一一作了介绍与阐释。教材每一章节之始，作者为其内容的重点知识词汇编制了知识网络图，这种最为直观的方式，可以使学生在学习前就对其有一个完整及初步的了解。
　　同时，每一章节还配有相关的案例以及分析，这样可以帮助学生理解相关知识并熟悉司法实践过程，提高运用能力。再有，每一章节还附有部分内容的知识图表，便于学生对所学的知识能够得到及时的总结和梳理。

　　《刑法学》这本教材语言简明易懂，便于老师和学生在短时间内，掌握刑法学的主要内容，并了解英国法是从怎样的角度和思路介绍刑法内容的。教材附录部分的重点词汇，可以使学生很快地理解重点词汇的含义，以扫清阅读和学习障碍。

作者简介

　　《法学初阶西方法学经典教材系列影印双语注释本》是英国PEARSON出版社出版的一套法学经典教材，教材由英国著名法学教授负责编写，本套教材一共有二十多本。该系列涵盖了国内法学本科生必修的法学课程内容，是一套非常适合中国法学院校本科生系统了解与学习英美法系课程内容的经典教材，同时该教材兼顾法律英语的学习目的。

目　　录

Chapter 1: Elements of criminal liability 1
Chapter 2: Actus reus 15
Chapter 3: Mens rea 33
Chapter 4: Inchoate offences 49
Chapter 5: Accessorial liability
Chapter 6: Murder
Chapter 7: Voluntary manslaughter
Chapter 8: Involuntary manslaughter
Chapter 9: Non-fatal offences
Chapter 10: Sexual offences
Chapter 11: Criminal damage
Chapter 12: Theft
Chapter 13: Theft-related offences
Chapter 14: Fraud

显示全部信息

在线试读部分章节

　　1 ELEMENTS of CRIMINAL LIAbILITy
　　Problems arise in fixing liability if there is a lapse in time after the actus reus before the mens rea comes into being and， equally， in situations where the mens rea precedes the actus reus。
　　Actus reus occurring before mens rea
　　This means that the defendant completes the prohibited act before he forms the prohibited state of mind。 The scenario in figure 1。1 is an example of this。
　　Two distinct approaches have been used to secure a conviction in situations where the actus reus is complete prior to the formation of mens rea：
　　treating the actus reus as a continuing act （Fagan）（see below）； and，
　　basing liability on failure to act after creating a dangerous situation （miller）（see pages 78）。 ExAm TIP Lack of coincidence is a popular examination topic。 you will need to be able to explain why lack of coincidence is a problem and how the courts have tackled this。 A good grasp of cases such as Fagan， miller and church is important as the facts demonstrate the problems with lack of coincidence and the judgments illustrate the creativity of the judiciary in overcoming this impediment to conviction。 KEy CAsE Fagan v。 Metropolitan Police Commissioner 〔1969〕 1 qB 439 （dC） Concerning： coincidence of actus reus and mens rea Facts

1 ELEMENTS of CRIMINAL LIAbILITy 
　　Problems arise in fixing liability if 
there is a lapse in time after the actus reus before the mens rea comes into 
being and， equally， in situations where the mens rea precedes the actus 
reus。 
　　Actus reus occurring before mens rea 
　　This means that the 
defendant completes the prohibited act before he forms the prohibited state of 
mind。 The scenario in figure 1。1 is an example of this。 
　　Two distinct 
approaches have been used to secure a conviction in situations where the actus 
reus is complete prior to the formation of mens rea： 
　　treating the actus 
reus as a continuing act （Fagan） （see below）； and， 
　　basing liability on 
failure to act after creating a dangerous situation （miller） （see pages 78）。 
ExAm TIP Lack of coincidence is a popular examination topic。 you will need to be 
able to explain why lack of coincidence is a problem and how the courts have 
tackled this。 A good grasp of cases such as Fagan， miller and church is 
important as the facts demonstrate the problems with lack of coincidence and the 
judgments illustrate the creativity of the judiciary in overcoming this 
impediment to conviction。 KEy CAsE Fagan v。 Metropolitan Police Commissioner 
〔1969〕 1 qB 439 （dC） Concerning： coincidence of actus reus and mens rea 
Facts 
　　The defendant accidentally stopped his car on a policeman’s foot but 
then refused to move when he realised this。 He appealed against his conviction 
for assaulting a police officer in the execution of his duty on the basis that 
at the time of the actus reus （when his car made contact with the policeman’s 
foot） he had no mens rea （because it was accidental） and by the time he formed 
mens rea （refusing to move） there was no act upon which to base liability （he 
merely refused to undo that which he had already done）。 Legal principle It was 
held that the actus reus of assault （in the sense of a battery） came into being 
when contact was first made between the car and the policeman’s foot。 This actus 
reus continued for the whole time that the car remained on the foot， only ending 
when the car was moved。 At the point in time that the defendant became aware of 
the contact and refused to move， he developed the requisite mens rea and 
liability was complete。 
　　……

显示全部信息

刑法学（Law Express 法学初阶——西方法学经典教材系列影印双语注释本）（著名法学家江平教授、许章润教授联袂推荐）下载

刑法学（Law Express 法学初阶——西方法学经典教材系列影印双语注释本）（著名法学家江平教授、许章润教授联袂推荐）

发布书评

相关图书推荐

刑法学（Law Express 法学初阶——西方法学经典教材系列 影印双语注释本）（著名法学家江平教授、许章润教授联袂推荐）

发布书评

相关图书推荐

刑法学（Law Express 法学初阶——西方法学经典教材系列影印双语注释本）（著名法学家江平教授、许章润教授联袂推荐）